Political analyst Mutahi Ngunyi has yet again unleashed a theory that reveals two crimes that Cord leader Raila Odinga allegedly admitted to having committed on Live television.
The hypothesis titled: Our First Presidential Debate for 2017, Uhuru vs Raila. The political scientist focuses on Raila's interview on Al Jazeera where he was questioned on corruption in Kenya.
In the interview, Raila is put to question whether he has ever paid a bribe by Al Jazeera's journalist Hasan Mehdi.
“Have you ever had to pay a bribe to have something done?” Mehdi asked.
In response, Odinga stated: "The question is when and not if because as you have rightly said every Kenyan has done it".
In the same interview, the Former Premier also admitted to have received a warning from his close confidantes- Sarah Elderkin that corrupt individuals were working for him while he was a Prime minister.
From his response, Ngunyi deduced that, Odinga was has been attacking Jubilee government on corruption yet he is actually a partaker in the vice.
“Raila admits to participating in corruption, he bribed. He also admits that while in Government the people around him were corrupt and so is he pretending to be holier than thou or is this sheer politics?” Ngunyi asked.
Ngunyi further sought to prove that the Opposition Chief conceded that he rigged the 2007 elections, following his response to a trivial question on election malpractice.
“But of course the independent commission that looked into the 2007 elections said that there was vote rigging on both sides. Aren't you just annoyed that you are not as good at vote rigging as your opponent?” Mehdi asked.
Odinga answered: "Actually I am proud that I am not as good in vote rigging."
In his opinion, Ngunyi concludes that: "Raila admits to rigging but conveniently thanks God that he is not as efficient in rigging as the Government's sharks. Bottom line he rigs and knows how to rig."