Screenshot of Senior counsel James Orengo, presenting his case at the Supreme Court, August 28, 2017.
Senior counsel James Orengo, has narrated to the Supreme Court, how most of the presidential election results forms, were 'generated', during the August 8, polls.
This is in relation to the ongoing petition petition, filed by the National Super Alliance (Nasa), which Orengo is representing.
He told the court that many of the forms 34As and 34Bs at the national tallying centre from the constituencies did not have security features, as directed by the IEBC.
According to him, IEBC did not have the original forms, hence generating those presented to court, to defend President Uhuru Kenyatta's win, after he was declared president-elect, in the August 8 polls.
"If you look at the names also, they are not similar to the original forms. Some forms have random names like Uhuru Kenyatta or Uhuru Kenyat ta instead of Kenyatta Uhuru; Raila Amolo Odinga or Raila Odinga instead of Odinga Raila and so on," Orengo told the court.
"This forms looks like they were locally generated at the constituencies," he added, as he handed over similar forms to the seven judges to have a look.
Forms 34A contain results tabulated at the polling station, and are signed by Presiding Officers.
Form 34B contain the sum of total results of all votes results from forms 34A from polling stations in particular constituencies and are signed by Returning Officers at the constituency level.
“Original forms 34A and 34B should be made available in court. Those submitted in court are forgeries. They are not authentic," Orengo said before the hearing started.