Supreme Court judges at the Court on November 20, 2017 during proceedings for the presidential election petition. [Photo/NMG]Presidential election petitioner Khelef Khalifa has said that he believes that the case they filed following the October 26 repeat poll was much stronger than the one filed by NASA against the August 8 Presidential election, but the judges ruled otherwise.Khalifa says only the judges know the reason, whether it was 'intimidation, or coercion' that made them reach the verdict they delivered in details on Monday."We respect their judgment but disagree with the ruling. Because on October 26 we know we had a stronger case than NASA’s on August 8," Khalifa says through an opinion piece on Tuesday's Star.He adds: "To give a comprehensive review of the judgment, we will release a comprehensive statement at the right time as Kura Yangu Sauti Yangu. It is premature to give the detailed report at this particular moment."He said the issues they filed in court were not allegations, as the judges had said, but facts. Khalifa, however, admits that they knew right from the beginning, that it was almost going to be 'impossible for the Supreme Court to annul two presidential elections in two months though our case was multiple and stronger'. "We lost the case unfairly. It's not us who lost, but the public. There were issues the court failed to take into consideration," writes Khalifa who is also the chairman of Muslims For Human Rights

Share news tips with us here at Hivisasa