Supreme Court judges during hearing of presidential election petition, August 2017. [Photo|Courtesy]The Supreme Court issued a detailed judgement after it nullified August presidential election, conducted by the IEBC, after the National Super Alliance (Nasa) contested the win.The judgement was read by Chief Justice David Maraga, his Deputy Philomena Mwilu, judges Isaac Lenaola and signed by Smokin Wanjala.Justice Jackton Ojwang and Njoki Ndung'u alos issued a detailed judgement, as to why, they dissented, and ruled in favour of the IEBC and President Uhuru Kenyatta.Below are Twitter reactions about the same, from various users.@JunetMohamedjubilee is complaining about justice Mwilu's ruling. Even if she did it in the kamba language it will still remain a supreme Court verdict@jamessmatKenya is the only country in the world with a whole chapter in the constitution on INTEGRITY. The Supreme Court is now reminding the country@MutahiNgunyiSupreme Court Judgement is about those WHO READ vs those WHO CAN'T READ. Why is JB OJWANG Not the CJ? His ELEGANCE makes Maraga look CRASS!@MatinaStevisJustice Mwilu is a judge not a newscaster. Seems this fact eludes those casting doubt on Supreme Court ruling bc of her slow reading thereof@kipmurkomenSupreme Court now says IEBC chairman must verify 40K forms 34A but after verifying should not alter.IMPOSSIBLE & RIDICULOUS @ahmednasirlaw@ahmednasirlawThis judgment is unworthy of the Supreme Court of kenya...a political act...designed to subvert the will of the Kenyan voter...simple...@MigunaMiguna 48mAs far as Justice Njoki Ndung'u is concerned the @IEBCKenya must obey the Maina Kiai decision but are free to defy the #SupremeCourt orders. @johnaglionbyMy abiding question after Kenya supreme court ruling: why did @IEBCKenya rush to declare the result? It had four more days under the law.

Is there a story unfolding in your community? Let Hivisasa know